Warren Buffett Style











References & LINKS

The Peg Ratio definition


The PEG ratio (Price/Earnings To Growth ratio) is a valuation metric for determining the relative trade-off between the price of a stock, the earnings generated per share (EPS), and the company's expected growth.

In general, the P/E ratio is higher for a company with a higher growth rate. Thus using just the P/E ratio would make high-growth companies appear overvalued relative to others. It is assumed that by dividing the P/E ratio by the earnings growth rate, the resulting ratio is better for comparing companies with different growth rates.[1]

The PEG ratio is considered to be a convenient approximation. It was popularized by Peter Lynch, who wrote in his 1989 book One Up on Wall Street that "The P/E ratio of any company that's fairly priced will equal its growth rate", i.e., a fairly valued company will have its PEG equal to 1.

Basic formula


                             Price/Earnings (P/E)
  PEG RATIO  = -----------------------------
                               Annual EPS Growth


The growth rate is expressed as a percentage above 100%, and should use real growth only, to correct for inflation. E.G if a company is growing at Earnings Per Share (EPS) 30% a year, and has a P/E of 30, it would have a PEG of 1.

A lower ratio is "better" (cheaper) and a higher ratio is "worse" (expensive).

The P/E ratio used in the calculation may be projected or trailing, and the annual growth rate may be the expected growth rate for the next year or the next five years.



Yahoo! Finance uses 5-year expected growth rate and an averaged P/E for calculating PEG (PEG for IBM is 1.26 on Aug 9, 2008 [1]).

The NASDAQ web-site uses the forecast growth rate (based on the consensus of professional analysts) and forecast earnings over the next 12 months. (PEG for IBM is 1.148 on Aug 9, 2008 [2]).

PEG as an indicator


PEG is a widely employed indicator of a stock's possible true value. Similar to PE ratios, a lower PEG means that the stock is undervalued more. It is favored by many over the price/earnings ratio because it also accounts for growth.

The PEG ratio of 1 is sometimes said to represent a fair trade-off between the values of cost and the values of growth, indicating that a stock is reasonably valued given the expected growth. A crude analysis suggests that companies with PEG values between 0 to 1 may provide higher returns.[2] The PEG Ratio can also be a negative number, for example, when earnings are expected to decline. This may be a bad signal, but not necessarily so. Under many circumstances a company will not grow earnings while its free cash flow improves substantially. Here, as in other cases, analyzing the components of PEG becomes paramount to a successful investment strategy.


The PEG ratio is commonly used and provided by various sources of financial and stock information. The PEG ratio, despite its wide use, is only a rule of thumb and has no accepted underlying mathematical basis. Its specific mathematical deficiency is explained here.

The PEG ratio's validity at extremes in particular (when used, for example, with low-growth companies) is highly questionable. It is generally only applied to so-called growth companies (those growing earnings significantly faster than the market).

When the PEG is quoted in public sources it may not be clear whether the earnings used in calculating the PEG is the past year's EPS or the expected future year's EPS; it is considered preferable to use the expected future growth rate.


It also appears that unrealistically high future growth rates (often as much as 5 years out, reduced to an annual rate) are sometimes used. The key is that management's expectations of future growth rates can be set arbitrarily high; this is a self-serving ploy where the objectives are to keep themselves in office and to make the stock artificially attractive to investors. A prospective investor would probably be wise to check out the reasonableness of the future growth rate by checking to see exactly how much the most recent quarter's earnings have grown, as a percentage, over the same quarter one year ago. Dividing this number into the future P/E ratio can give a decidedly different and perhaps a more realistic PEG ratio.



Investors may prefer the PEG ratio because it explicitly puts a value on the expected growth in earnings of a company. The PEG ratio can offer a suggestion of whether a company's high P/E ratio reflects an excessively high stock price or is a reflection of promising growth prospects for the company.

Disadvantages OF THE PEG RATIO


The PEG ratio is less appropriate for measuring companies without high growth. Large, well-established companies, for instance, may offer dependable dividend income, but little opportunity for growth.

A company's growth rate is an estimate. It is subject to the limitations of projecting future events. Future growth of a company can change due to any number of factors: market conditions, expansion setbacks, and hype of investors. Also, the convention that "PEG=1" is appropriate is somewhat arbitrary and considered a rule-of-thumb metric.


The simplicity and convenience of calculating PEG leaves out several important variables. First, the absolute company growth rate used in the PEG does not account for the overall growth rate of the economy, and hence an investor must compare a stock's PEG to average PEG's across its industry and the entire economy to get any accurate sense of how competitive a stock is for investment. A low (attractive) PEG in times of high growth in the entire economy may not be particularly impressive when compared to other stocks, and vice versa for high PEG's in periods of slow growth or recession.


In addition, company growth rates that are much higher than the economy's growth rate are unstable and vulnerable to any problems the company may face that would prevent it from keeping its current rate. Therefore, a higher-PEG stock with a steady, sustainable growth rate (compared to the economy's growth) can often be a more attractive investment than a low-PEG stock that may happen to just be on a short-term growth "streak". A sustained higher-than-economy growth rate over the years usually indicates a highly profitable company, but can also indicate a scam, especially if the growth is a flat percentage no matter how the rest of the economy fluctuates (as was the case for several years for returns in Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme).


Finally, the volatility of highly speculative and risky stocks, which have low price/earnings ratios due to their very low price, is also not corrected for in PEG calculations. These stocks may have low PEG's due to a very low short-term (~1 year) PE ratio (e.g. 100% growth rate from $1 to $2 /stock) that does not indicate any guarantee of maintaining future growth or even solvency.

References and links


^ Easton, Peter D. (January 2002), Does The Peg Ratio Rank Stocks According To The Market's Expected Rate Of Return On Equity Capital?, [dead link]

^ Khattab, Joseph (April 6, 2006), How Useful Is the PEG Ratio?, The Motley Fool,, retrieved November 21, 2010 


External links

Investopedia - PEG Ratio


v d eStock market

Types of stocks

Common stock  Concentrated stock  Golden share  Growth stock  Issued shares  Preferred stock  Restricted stock  Shares authorized  Shares outstanding  Tracking stock  Treasury stock


Broker-dealer  Floor broker  Floor trader  Investor  Market maker  Proprietary trader  Quantitative analyst  Stock trader


Electronic communication network  Market opening times  Over-the-counter  Stock exchange (list Multilateral trading facility

Stock valuation

Alpha  Arbitrage pricing theory  Beta  Book value  CAPM  Dividend yield  Earnings per share  Earnings yield  Gordon model  SCL  SML  T-Model

Financial ratios

Cap rate  D/E ratio  Dividend cover  Dividend payout ratio  EV/EBITDA  EV/GCI  EV/Sales  CROCI  P/B ratio  P/CF ratio  P/E  PEG  P/S ratio  RAROC  ROA  ROCE  ROE  ROTE  ROIC  SGR  Sharpe ratio  Treynor ratio

Trading theories

Algorithmic trading  Buy and hold  Contrarian investing  Day trading  Efficient-market hypothesis  Fundamental analysis  Market timing  Modern portfolio theory  Momentum investing  Mosaic theory  Pairs trade  Post-modern portfolio theory  Random walk hypothesis  Style investing  Swing trading  Technical analysis  Trend following

Related terms

Block trade  Cross listing  Dark liquidity  Dividend  Dual-listed company  DuPont Model  Flight-to-quality  Haircut  IPO